Sunday, April 11, 2004


United States and other western powers go around world to ban weapon of mass destruction because its potencial of killing of innocent people as collateral damage. Here is philosophical dilemma. Who makes the rule that killing of men of arms is only good killing. So killing of people in military uniform is civilized way to kill some one?

If any killing of innocent people is considered uncivilized, should we make ban of any weapon which may potentially kill innocent people? If that hold true, we should ban all weapons of such like bomb, land mine, rifle, even bow and arrow. Most civilized war or fight should be the one with real cold weapons like swords, spear and other cold weapons which need close face to face, hand to hand combat because this is the only way you know for sure who you are trying to kill. No kidding, you are fighting your enemy face to face without any mistake.

If international law make cold weapon war as ways of civilized conflicts into reality, Mongol and East Asian countries will definitely superpower for sure since they have perfected art of wars with cold weapons

Who dares to chanllenge conventional view or genius could become anothergenius.